Sometimes a thought comes, like it or not, and will not go away.
You hate the thought.
It is insolent.
No respect for weeks, months, perhaps even years or decades of carefully worked out “other thoughts”. Much more polite and rational thoughts. Well behaved thoughts that neatly fit a tidy mind, untainted by whispers of “conspiracy theory” or “crazy talk”. Groomed thoughts that have had a place at the table of the mind for a very long time. Now being insulted by a “crazy talk” upstart thought.
It just “shows up” and says “I’m here, get over it.” while shoving the other thoughts into the “does not fit the image” bucket. (Or, in rare occasions such as this one, into a “there are two possible images” bucket).
So what to do with it.
How about sharing?
The impetus was a somewhat quasi paranoid video link posted by Scarlet Pumpernickel in T4. It’s a long video ( a bit shy of two hours) and wanders over a lot of turf. Most of it being an exposition of the New World Order links of various modern events, some of the families involved (such as the Rockefeller family) and ideas about where things are headed going forward. Which countries need to be “taken down” as they are not under proper control. The use of Israel as a new “Ulster” in the Middle East (a reference to The Crown planting a bunch of Protestants in North Ireland to create a permanent divide between the two halves so easier to control from outside).
And that caused a wheel to spin…
IF (note that word, it matters.) IF there is a New World Order and it is out to control the world by all the nefarious means in the video (and elsewhere) then what it fears is made visible by what it attacks. What it attacked was Islam In The Middle East via planting Israel as an “Ulster” (per the video). What has happened lately? Various “non compliant” independent Muslim Leaders have been “taken down”. What is “on deck”? Two orthogonal types of “non compliant” Islamic leaders. Assad in Syria (who has a connection to a philosophy of National State Socialism via old W.W.II historical links between the Ba’athist history and Germany) and the Ayatollah in Iran ( who has a kind of non-compliant religious base that is not prone to ‘molding’…)
One is a style from the past that has been disposed. The Fascist Socialism and the Nazi Socialism were “Third Way Socialisms” as presently being pushed by the “Progressives”; and they WERE the darlings of the Progressives prior to W.W.II – we have historical records to show it – but were ‘disposed’ when it became clear that the “racist” aspect “had issues” and the “dictatorial leader” part needed turning into a committee. The other is a reminder of the Catholics who were an ‘out of control’ power center for centuries. (Per the video – really ‘the audio’ as the image is static, the Catholic Church was finally ‘brought under control’ via slow infiltration. Given the recent Papal endorsement for Global Warming there is circumstantial evidence for some ‘coordination’… so running with the meme…)
The (admittedly semi-paranoid) ‘frame’ is that the N.W.O. is doing a “take down” on those bits that need better controlling. While I could make a decent case for them being correct and moral about that, doing so would violate the theme of this particular muse, so will be held for another day. ASSUMING that the NWO is ‘nefarious’ and having it take over is a bad thing: This would imply that Islam Is A Threat. (Assad is just an out of control individual, so less important, though his citizens are connected mostly to Sunni Islam at about 74% so ought to be influenced by The House Of Saud who, one presumes, are ‘on board’ with the whole NWO thing as we keep defending them…)
I can see how that logic would run. First off, the Muslims have a history of being independent and not bowing down to the control structures from outside. Secondly, they don’t take to externally directed change much. Finally, they have a profound tendency to adhere to the Koran and NEVER accept deviation or ‘interpretation’. Hard to influence that… (Though, as in Saudi, the leadership can be co-opted – per the thesis being modeled…) So it’s not going to go well to have these ‘independent types’ running around to defy the New Authority… Add to that the point that if Iran DID succeed in getting nukes it would be “way out of control” and season it with the point that if they DID wipe out Israel (as I’m pretty sure they could do, technically) there would be no “New Ulster” in the Middle East. That could have all of Islam turning to look at the REST of the world, and upsetting a certain well planned apple cart…
Now, while I personally have no desire to EVER live under Sharia Law, and would be quite happy with an “Our Side – Your Side; live and let live” world: That would never be acceptable to the kind of Control Freak that wants to found a world dominion of Central Planned Control. So we can take that idea out of the ‘mental model’. That leaves “Let Iran/Syria run to their own completion” or “The Takedown”. Letting it run to completion would be a last resort “damage control” solution. (“They” never give up, but are skilled at strategic retreat then envelopment). It would take decades, perhaps even a century to recover from that path. So the “Take Down” would be the preferred model.
OK, now “play it forward”. IF there is a ‘take down’, followed by a UN Occupation, followed by a fully UN compliant ‘interim government’ for a few decades, with massive “education” campaigns; then you have evidence that fits the NWO model. IF there is no ‘take down’, OR, it is followed by a non-central-control aftermath, there is evidence contrary to the model.
Furthermore, the notion that folks would risk nuclear war and a Jihad with all of Islam implies that the stakes are high. Very High. The necessary consequence of that conclusion is that Islam is a significant threat to the New World Order (at least, the particular parts of Islam in question). That, then, leads to an odd unexpected end point:
Islam is Freedoms Last Best Defense against the New World Order.
So Think About It
Please remember that this is a ‘thought experiment’. NOTHING in it is reflective if me, my wants, needs, aspiration, person, or wishes. (It likely has some reflections of any limitations in my input data and ability to imagine, unavoidable for any simulation ‘playing it forward’).
Though it might raise interesting questions about the kind of person who thinks such things from such inputs, that’s not the bit I’d like to ponder.
BOTH images “fit the known facts” (at least, those known to me). Both an “out of control nutcase Dictator Assad and Crazy Nuke Hungry Ayatollah” image fits; AND a “NWO Needs To Do A Take Down” model fits.
SO, the questions:
How to choose between them? Where is Occam when you need him…
What further evidence would help?
Is there some other last best hope after Islam?
IS Islam the last best hope for Freedom from the NWO?
Is that a good thing, or a bad thing?