Dear Donald, per Melania

Dear Donald,

I understand that “lying Ted” has used a nude picture of Melania from a G.Q. shoot (or some such) in some kind of political add.

First off, I don’t care. For or against. Frankly, Ted’s “dirty tricks” are now into the 4 or 6 th iteration. He can no longer say it was some staffer or rogue “whatever”. It is now clearly and undeniably a tactic. He “owns it”.

Second, I’m sorry, but I envy you your wife. You know it. I know it. She’s “Hot”.

Melania Trump looking a bit hot.

Melania Trump looking a bit hot.

I understand your desire to protect your spouse. It’s an instinct with many guys. But think just a minute. It’s not her he is attacking, it is you. Don’t take the bait.

Quite frankly, just about every guy in America not married to a Supermodel envies you. That’s an OK thing. Embrace it. We all know we have no chance in hell with Melania, nor anyone in her category. We admire you for that. Ted tossing crap about it just shows he’s a “loser” and has more envy than brains. (Or is that more envy than balls?… hard to say…)

Furthermore, Melania is a Class Act. From start to finish. She can be the Vixen (as only you would know, damn it…) or she can be a class act.

Melania looking sexy classy

Melania looking sexy classy

But frankly, what is most important, is she can be the regal Princess in a First Lady kind of way. It isn’t you we look at in this picture…

Melania looking like a First Spouse

Melania looking like a First Spouse

It is just all the more special that we’ve seen what you’ve got, and know she is up to the task, whatever it might be. So Ted can’t handle that, and certainly can’t handle you. Hell, I doubt he could even handle Melania.

Melania at desk

Melania at desk

So my advice to you is pretty simple. Do not attack Ted on this. That gives him air time. Just have Melania issue a brief statement that she is so sorry to see that Ted is unhappy, and would just love to help him, but she has “other commitments” so he will have to take second best…

Just a thought…

For what it is worth, having Melania as First Lady would just drive most of the world leaders crazy. IMHO, you need to give her more stage time to “make her case”. She’s a class act from what I’ve seen. Let her have a bit of a “cat fight” in the ring and a whole lot of us would be rooting for her, and you. Frankly, a man / woman team both “Winners” is very hard to ignore. (Body Paint optional.) Watching Ted lose to a ‘girl’ would just be priceless. Just sayin’…

Oh, and is there any chance I can buy the calendar? “will vote for you for calendar”… Again, just sayin’…

Subscribe to feed

About E.M.Smith

A technical managerial sort interested in things from Stonehenge to computer science. My present "hot buttons' are the mythology of Climate Change and ancient metrology; but things change...
This entry was posted in Political Current Events and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Dear Donald, per Melania

  1. p.g.sharrow says:

    I don’t know about Melania. She looks to be Too skinny for my taste. As an old stockman that heifer appears to be unhealthy thin to me…;-)…pg

  2. Another Ian says:

    E.M.

    I know it is how you say it but perhaps it would be wiser if you used “cheering for”. Otherwise

    Our southern hemisphere useage as I learned to explain is “physically possible but not quite socially acceptable”.

    Been something similar over at Red Power as to what a stuffing box was

  3. tom0mason says:

    Trump called out Cruz threatening to “spill the beans” on his wife, Heidi Cruz. However, Donald has not gone into detail about what he was referring to when “spilling the beans”.

    Too much ‘fight the man’ and not the policies? This spat may keep the ‘Borg Ferengi*’ (aka Hillary) off the news-feeds for a while but will it convince people vote for either of them?

    *see http://thepeoplescube.com/current-truth/obama-s-birth-certificate-proves-he-s-not-from-earth-t2089.html and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferengi

  4. Steve Crook says:

    This reminds me of a scene from the Muscles From Brussels film “Time Cop”. In which the baddie meets a version of himself from a different time. They merge and with some (for the day) ground breaking special effects morph into a revolting doughnutty shape which eventually disappears with a sort of sploooorrrrrrppp noise.

    Seems to me that the ‘presidential’ race has just hit that very same “sploooorrrrrrppp” moment.

    Still, it could be worse, in Spain they’ve had an election in December, no-one won it (thank heavens for proportional representation) and none of their leadership material can agree on anything for long enough to form something that would at least have a stab at running the country (cats fighting in a sack springs to mind). So they’re going to do it all again in June.

  5. Larry Ledwick says:

    “spill the beans” on his wife, Heidi Cruz. — I suspect that this is a reference to publicly pointing out that she is a big honcho at Goldman Sachs.

    http://dealbreaker.com/2016/03/donald-trump-heidi-cruz-threat-goldman/

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/14/us/politics/ted-cruz-wall-street-loan-senate-bid-2012.html

  6. spetzer86 says:

    You should include this shot of Melania with Cruz’s kids: http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2015/08/06/aww-ted-cruzs-daughters-charm-the-competition-at-cleveland-debate/

    Looking fairly motherly there. Pretty much the full package with that woman

  7. John Howard says:

    I lean toward the voluptous myself… just a matter of preference.

  8. JRadig says:

    “I understand that “lying Ted” has used a nude picture of Melania from a G.Q. shoot (or some such) in some kind of political add.

    First off, I don’t care. For or against. Frankly, Ted’s “dirty tricks” are now into the 4 or 6 th iteration. He can no longer say it was some staffer or rogue “whatever”. It is now clearly and undeniably a tactic. He “owns it”.”

    EXCEPT – The ad was posted by an independent superpac, and denounced by Ted, appently several times.
    General principles support holding Cruz responsible for what the people he hired for his campaign do. The same doesn’t work for actions of a group that, by law, are not to have any coordination whatsoever. (I know, the law can be honored with winks and nods, but I don’t see any reason to think that’s the case here.)

    FWIW I have no quarrel with your comments about Mrs. Trump.

  9. JRadig says:

    Some related thoughts about news coverage of the issue/events here:
    http://thefederalist.com/2016/03/25/3-problems-with-media-coverage-of-attacks-on-heidi-cruz/

  10. M Simon says:

    JRadig,

    If you believe PACs are independent. Well I have a bridge that needs a few repairs but when it is fixed it will be worth a fortune… Care to get in on the ground floor?

    Trump fired all the PACs that were trying to form around him. He didn’t want ANY outside big money.

    ======

    A former Soviet Citizen looks at The Donald:
    http://classicalvalues.com/2016/03/a-former-soviet-discusses-trump/

  11. M Simon says:

    Speaking of “uncoordinated” PACs – A Ted Cruz PAC gave a Carly Fiorina PAC $500,000. Odd isn’t it? The FEC thinks so:

    http://classicalvalues.com/2016/03/identity-politics/

    Latest joke going around anti-Cruz circles.

    “I did not have sex with that woman.

    And that woman.

    And that woman. And that woman. And that woman.”

Comments are closed.