Without Comment… Obama In His Own Words

Between 45 seconds and 1 minute.

There is no comment as I have no idea what to say. It is his words.

Subscribe to feed

About E.M.Smith

A technical managerial sort interested in things from Stonehenge to computer science. My present "hot buttons' are the mythology of Climate Change and ancient metrology; but things change...
This entry was posted in Political Current Events and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

26 Responses to Without Comment… Obama In His Own Words

  1. Arrin says:

    I am becoming more and more convinced that Obama is truly a traitor and not so much someone the controllers have needed to blackmail or threaten to do their bidding. It is going to be very difficult if not impossible for a majority of US citizens to come to this realization. It is too much of a stretch for most. We have our own issues up here in Canada with our prime minister Justin Trudeau. His dad (Pierre) was taught by Jesuits, was a communist sympathisizer (which would probably make him one too) and there are some reports he and his wife Margaret were mind controlled with the use of LSD on Vancouver island prior to becoming prime minister. And if you look into this further, the story as it is told gets very dark (see Trance Formation of America). I do not know what is up with his son Justin who grew up in dysfunctional family (dad always working and mom covorting with the Rolling Stones and apparently became bipolar, perhaps connected to the LSD), but clearly, he is a pathological liar like many other politicians and leading us Canadians down a very dangerous road towards what is looking more and more like communism. These are very precarious times we live in. The truth must be known. That is the only way out of this mess. God bless all (and I do not quite know what to think of God but it feels right to say this).

  2. kneel63 says:

    I don’t know what to say, except that the first defence of this will be “taken out of context”.
    The real question then is: does the full context make it better or worse?

  3. omanuel says:

    There is little or no doubt of Obama’s loyality to Islam. More troubling to me the questionable loyality of the US National Academy of Sciences to the basic principles of science.

  4. omanuel says:

    In spite of dislike for dogmatic sciences and religions, it is intriguing that scientists at the University of Tokyo discovered and reported in 1991 that

    1. Isotopes of molybdenum in massive iron meteorites contain a clear record of nucleo-synthesis (Origin of the Elements) undisturbed by any geochemical process after ejection from near the core of a supernova, and . . .

    2. The Holy Stone of Mecca is probably a few fragments from such an iron meteorite.

  5. Glenn999 says:

    It’s amazing it took so long, but in the last week I have heard and read so much of those finally starting to connect the dots. It used to be considered a “nutjob” kind of idea to even suggest a connection. Now many are openly wondering “what could be his motivation?”. The interview on Hannity on Friday afternoon with Phil Haney and Rich Higgins was jaw-dropping.: (Rich Higgins, Vice President, Intelligence and National Security Programs, Former Manager with the Department of Defense (DOD), Combating Terrorism Technical Support Office & Irregular Warfare Support Program (IWSP and Phil Haney a founding member of the Department of Homeland Security, explains the work he was carrying out and his research and analytics could have stopped terror attacks on our nation. Rich and Philip will talk about the amount of terrorism facing America right now, and just how willfully unprepared we truly are to face it. )

  6. Crashex says:

    Just as Cashis Clay changed his name to Mohammed Ali as an outward sign of his commitment to Islam, Barry Soetoro changed his name to Barrack Hussein Obama as an outward sign of his commitment to his biological father’s faith. There have been many comments and actions to demonstrate that our President self-identifies as a Muslim, but he knows that it would not be politically expedient to admit that directly, so he lies about his loyalties to maintain the position of authority through which he can institute change.

    Remember, his most trusted adviser is Valeri Jarret, an Iranian muslim. Do you think that may have influenced the deal negotiated with Iran?

  7. John Robertson says:

    The ordinary citizen instinctively knows what this man is.
    Record gun sales every time he speaks.
    The contempt for our elected “leaders” running rampant through out the nation.
    The citizens of the republic know in their souls that this President and his sycophants have no respect for constitution,nation or citizens.
    Intellectually they may struggle to articulate their understanding of the corruption.
    But their spending habits, speak volumes.
    Obama’s number one accomplishment has been to reveal the blatant corruption of the political parties.
    Democrats are blatant.
    Republicans seem impotent even complicit.
    Shadow Democrats?
    The distance between national interests and political interests are vast and growing daily.
    Or so it seems.

  8. Larry Ledwick says:

    I hope I live long enough to see the history written about this period. It will be very interesting to see it viewed with the perspective of time.
    As Grandma used to say “actions speak louder than words”

  9. Larry Ledwick says:

    I will put this here so it can be found in the future, it does explain a few things about Barack Obama, for example I was unaware that his father also went to Harvard. Being the son of an alumni most certainly helped Barack Obama II gain entry which may folks have puzzled over.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/19/nyregion/letters-by-and-about-barack-obamas-father.html

  10. hillbilly33 says:

    Australia has the same problem with the current Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, who undermined our elected P.M Tony Abbott and conned enough “nervous nellies” in the Liberal Party to support him in “backstabbing’ Abbott. Turnbull is an out-and-out apologist for Islam, on the same page as Obama. Here’s his latest slap in the face to Australians in general and especially the true conservatives in the once great Liberal party, who are appalled at his actions and deeply alarmed at the directions he is now seeking to take the country!

    http://www.michaelsmithnews.com/2016/06/turnbull-ramadan-dinner-guest-hate-preacher-sheik-shady-can-we-kill-civilians-yet-al-suleiman-.html

  11. wyoskeptic says:

    I have had the conviction that Obama is devoted to the Islam cause for a number of years now. I think it was the first time I heard him reference the “holy” koran (or Quran) that the alarm bells started going off. I fully believe he is engaging in the process of Taqiyya, which to put it simply is a requirement to engage in any and all deception with the intent to further the aim of Islam and its expansion, that this process is not just acceptable but is required by the faithful.

    As for Obama not being able to express any form of criticism when terrorists are concerned, it must be remembered that to criticize any other Muslim or Islamic believer is to face a charge of Apostasy, the penalty for which is death. Now, if the individual is pursuing Taqiyya, then the individual may make any such statements as necessary as long as doing so furthers the cause of Islam, but if misunderstood, it could lead to one getting put to death. So that is a cautious line that needs be walked. As his exit date approaches, I fully expect him to come out more and more in favor of the Islamic cause.

    I fully expect it to take decades, if it is even possible, to undo all the damage this one man has caused to this country. I am truly not sure if it can be done. It may very well be that there is shaping up a conflict that will put all the wars fought on the face of this earth up until this time to shame.

    All the “radical terrorists” to date all share one common denominator: they are neither radical nor terrorists. They are but very devout believers. ISIS is nothing more than a very clear demonstration of what Muhammad was and what he believed. The only difference is that instead of riding camels or horses, they now ride Nissan or Toyota pickups while using twitter and Facebook.

    Bring back any of the fighters from the Crusades and they would be right at home. They would tell you that nothing has changed. Nothing in 1400 years. So anyone who thinks they will willingly assimilate is going to be very greatly disappointed.

    America and the West is in an undeclared war not of their choosing. Not because the West wants it so, but rather because to Islam, there has never been any end to the war of Conquest. The crusades and all the rest is still ongoing. Islam will not stop until all the world embraces it or all the Kafir that do not are either enslaved or dead. As far as Islam is concerned, there is no other outcome. None.

    Until everyone understands and realizes this, there is going to be a lot of innocent blood spilled and a very high body count. One way or another, the eventual outcome will entail one lot of death. Shortly, the issue will be very much in doubt.

  12. A C Osborn says:

    Can anyone confirm that all those clips are definitely Obama, as some look more like stand ins.
    But the other do not and he makes it very clear where his loyalties lie.
    I hadn’t even realised that he changed his name to a muslim one.

  13. E.M.Smith says:

    I’m pretty good at fine facial recognition and voice printing. Some of those are a younger him, but it all matches IMHO. A good computer edit could change the words, though, but my lip read matched the sounds… While it could be a very high tech fake (including faked poor edits), the more likely path of deception would just be context edits. Say, as a theoretical, he had said “Some question my Muslim faith, but ignore I was raised Christian my whole life, and they are idiots!” Just edit to the preamble and you get an inflammatory statement via edit.

    But that is why I posted without comment. All I can do is blind speculation both ways…

    The proof would be to find the original sources and view in full context. A “dig here” for someone else… I’m already way over committed already…

  14. E.M.Smith says:

    BTW, the “tell” for me is the deep bow to Saudi royaly, but not to HRH of the UK.

  15. Have you tried to read that (Tallbloke) Murry Salby PDF yet?
    To me the first 200 pages of 717, are but an attempt to salvage sloppy Meteorological fantasy phrases like ‘air parcel’, ‘hydrostatic equilibrium’, ‘adiabatic process’,and ‘potential temperature’ as something with scientific meaning but fails miserably! For example: “air parcel, which is defined by a fixed collection of matter.”, yet the troposphere remains ‘well mixed’! How scientific can be a ‘fixed collection’, which cannot be located? So far I have not found any “why we have meridional then zonal regimes on a long cycle, or why el nino vs la nina rates also oscillate on a long cycle?”. The reading for comprehension is tough!
    All the best! -will-

  16. E.M.Smith says:

    I did give it a go. Had a similar “what’s new here? Eh…” kind of reaction. Decided maybe to try again later… then didn’t get back to it.

  17. E.M.Smith says: 20 June 2016 at 8:44 pm

    “I did give it a go. Had a similar “what’s new here? Eh…” kind of reaction. Decided maybe to try again later… then didn’t get back to it.”
    I hope this was not to far afield from this threadf! I have given up on calling things meteorological fantasy over at tallblokes! Should I post elsewhere if I find something of significance, in that mess?
    All the best! -will

  18. E.M.Smith says:

    When in doubt, and if no clear related thread exists, use “tips”. But I’m not hung up on off topic, other than it makes it hard to find something later… so “weather paper” doesn’t shout “Obama muslim topic”at me ;-)

  19. Larry Ledwick says:

    Interesting item here on Obama Sr. and the saga of who did what when by who’s support.
    http://www.wnd.com/2016/06/unearthed-letters-cast-doubt-on-obamas-family-story/

  20. Gail Combs says:

    Crashex says:

    Just as Cashis Clay changed his name to Mohammed Ali as an outward sign of his commitment to Islam, Barry Soetoro changed his name to Barrack Hussein Obama as an outward sign of his commitment to his biological father’s faith….

    It goes the other way too. My Muslim Grandfather changed his name to Frank when he left Islam.

    Because of the name change of Barry Soetoro change to Barrack Hussein Obama, I have always known Obummer to be a Muslim.

    Also remember he only became a ‘Christian’ because he was told he needed to be a ‘Chistian’ in order to sway Blacks as a community organizer. What church does he pick? That of Jeremiah Wright another muslim practicing Deception.

    “At the rally on October 19, 2015, after addressing Louis Farakhan and the crowd with the Muslim greeting As-salamu alaykum”

  21. E.M.Smith says:

    I need to look at that whole name change thing more. I once heard him say his parents had never expected him to be a political candidate when they named him Barrack Hussein… so finding that clip and comparing to history would be interesting…

  22. p.g.sharrow says:

    Rev, Wright said that Barack was a very good substitute preacher, But, Barack never seemed to grasp the true meaning of being a Christian.

    Barack said “When things become difficult, I will stand with the Muslims”

    The Obama administration is filled with Muslim advisers.

    Is it a wonder that American money and power is being squandered in the service of Muslim Warlords and everything is being done by this administration to project a Muslim reputation as a religion of peace.

    For 1500 years Islam has been waging a war of Conquest and plunder against Others. They are the Slavers of Africa and brag about it and the fortunes it brought them. They cry out the loudest when their victims fight and drive them back. They destroy everything they touch. Great civilizations that they have occupied turn into hell holes for the people that live there.
    Convert or die is not a civilized thing. It is the mantra of a war cult. When the Christians turned on the Muslims and fed them their own medicine. They cried out how terrible that the Christians were to do such a thing. Barrack Hussein Obama complains about loudly about how badly the Christians treated Muslims in the effort to drive them back. He is a Muslim in word and deed. To claim to be a christian is a lie. But then, He is the Great Deceiver…pg

  23. Larry Ledwick says:

    The idea promoted by many apologists that the Crusades were somehow unprovoked violence against peaceful Muslims is only possible for those who have absolutely no grasp of history.

    https://www.politicalislam.com/jihad-lead-crusades/

  24. Gail Combs says:

    Bill Warner, PhD (from North Carolina) does a great analysis. He has a PhD in physics and math, NC State University, 1968 and uses source texts for his documentation.

    A short on Jihad vs Crusades

    Why We Are Afraid, A 1400 Year Secret

    The history of Islam based on numbers and facts that you may not see anywhere else. It is well worth the watch. If it is the one I remember it mentions North Africa as farming country until the Muslim goat herders turned loose ther goats on the christian farms and tons of fertile soil washed into the sea. It also shows that Islam DESTROYED civilization (books and learning) because all knowledge is contained in the Koran.

  25. Gail Combs says:

    My Dr Werner Utubes got booted by WordUnimpressed. The newest game is to toss the info into the trash bucket. (Trump requests for donations now goes to trash in gmail accounts after the MSM made a big deal about him being underfunded. However GOPe requests do not.)

    It is interesting that Philip Haney, who worked for the Department of Homeland Security for 15 years has said “DHS ordered me to scrub records of Muslims with terror ties.”
    Search Philip Haney and you get an earful.

    I also saw in passing there are now muslims (I think five) with high positions in the DHS as well as throughout the entire US government.

    Interesting how the Patriot Act was passed in response to the 9/11 islamic terrorist attack but now all reference to jihad and islam has been scrubbed from government paper work. Instead we have focus on ‘homegrown terrorists’ that is retired military, Secret Service, CIA, FBI and other normal Americans.

    Napolitano stands by controversial report (2009)

    Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said Wednesday that she was briefed before the release of a controversial intelligence assessment and that she stands by the report, which lists returning veterans among terrorist risks to the U.S. …

    In her statement Wednesday, Ms. Napolitano defended the report, which says “rightwing extremism” may include groups opposed to abortion and immigration, as merely one among several threat assessments….
    In her statement Wednesday, Ms. Napolitano defended the report, which says “rightwing extremism” may include groups opposed to abortion and immigration, as merely one among several threat assessments….
    (wwwDOT)washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/16/napolitano-stands-rightwing-extremism/

    Remember these are the same people likely to end up on a no-fly list and if Congress Demonrats get their way, will lose their 2nd Amnendment rights.
    ………………..

    This whole document was obtained by Judicial Watch as a 133 page FOIA document. It was obtained from the Department of Defense and is entitled AFSS 0910 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND TREATMENT INCIDENTS (EOTI) LESSON PLAN.
    SEE:(wwwDOT)judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-defense-department-teaching-documents-suggest-mainstream-conservative-views-extremist/

    The whole thing was a bizzare down the rabbit hole experience. This is from the government of the USA???

    This is the document that says:
    “…
    D. Extremist Ideologies
    1. Introduction
    • As noted, an ideology is a set of political beliefs about the nature of people and society. People who are committed to an ideology seek not only to persuade but to recruit others to their belief. In U.S. history, there are many examples of extremist ideologies and movements. The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule and the Confederate states who sought to secede from the Northern states are just two examples.

    2. Ideologies
    a. Nationalism – The policy of asserting that the interests of one’s own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations. Many nationalist groups take it a step further and believe that their national culture and interests are superior to any other national group.

    b. Supremacy – The belief that one’s race or ethnicity is superior to all others and should dominate society. Supremacy, as with racial supremacies in general, has frequently resulted in anti-Black and anti-Semitic violence.

    c. Separatism – Setting oneself or others apart based on culture, ethnicity, race, or religion.”

    This explains why Robert E Lee’s Battle Flag, a part of our southern history, was so viciously attacked by the media and the US government.

    We really are down a rabbit hole where truth and fact has been turned on it’s head.

  26. Gail Combs says:

    Oh, good the UTubes showed up.

Anything to say?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s