Interesting Video on USA Election Influence

I find this an interesting Bitchute video about how the CIA has worked to influence various elections over the years.

Bitchute per CIA

Subscribe to feed


About E.M.Smith

A technical managerial sort interested in things from Stonehenge to computer science. My present "hot buttons' are the mythology of Climate Change and ancient metrology; but things change...
This entry was posted in Political Current Events and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Interesting Video on USA Election Influence

  1. Oliver K. Manuel says:

    By 1 April 2017 I should have documented and undeniable evidence that National Academies of Sciences hid nuclear energy from society after nations and national science academies were united under the UN on 24 OCT 1945.

  2. Oliver K. Manuel says:

    President Trump plan to restore America to greatness and contact with reality) faces incredibly massive, worldwide opposition from the unholy alliance of the UN with the UNAS (united national academies of sciences).

  3. pouncer says:

    Hi Dr Manuel,

    May I suggest that evidence and analysis released either 31 March or 2 April will be received more seriously than anything anyone presents on the 1st of the 4th month?

  4. philjourdan says:

    The video is speculation combined with known facts and a touch of paranoia. However, that does not change the fact that the US (through the CIA and other daughter agencies) has attempted, or actually have influenced elections throughout the years since WWII (prior to that, we were pretty much isolationist, but some Banana Republics may disagree). I do not understand those who think what Russia (and the not mentioned China and the rest of the world – INCLUDING the UK – Hello? Banning Trump from Travel to the country???) have JUST started doing that last year.

    We do not need a litany of history showing where the US has interfered to know that is how foreign policy is played. And anyone who thinks differently (hillary) should never be in a foreign policy job.

    But then Benghazi showed us that.

  5. E.M.Smith says:


    Yes, but it is interesting to see it all in one video, and also interesting to see Bitchute works.

  6. Oliver K. Manuel says:

    @ pounced By coincidence, all others days of the year are reserved for publication of the UN’s Nobel-Prize-Winning Propaganda (“97% consensus science”) to hide the beautiful, bountiful and benevolent “Higher Power” that made our elements, birthed the entire solar system in a supernova explosion ~5.1 Ga ago, and then sustained the origin and evolution of life on Earth into human form.

  7. R. de Haan says:

    The Dutch Government contributed 70 million USD in support of the Clinton Presidential Campaign, They were not the only foreign contributors meddling in USA politics. What comes around goes around.

  8. philjourdan says:

    @R de Haan – I do not think most of the foreign contributors were “willing” donors. Like most, the thought Hillary would win, and both she and Bill made clear that they were running “Pay to Play”. So most of the contributions were not a “pre-emptive” buying of influence, but a recognition that a day in the US “court” would require the price of admission.

    One of the primary reasons the democrats are pushing the Russian meme so much is they do not WANT that to come to light (and also because Russia refused to pay).

Comments are closed.