Clinton Paid For “Russian Dossier”

Everyone remembers the infamous peeing prostitutes lie of a “dossier” on Trump.

Well, no real surprise (the surprise is that they’ve been caught out…); turns out it was paid for by the Clinton Campaign…

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/clinton-campaign-dnc-paid-for-research-that-led-to-russia-dossier/2017/10/24/226fabf0-b8e4-11e7-a908-a3470754bbb9_story.html

Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier

By Adam Entous, Devlin Barrett and Rosalind S. Helderman October 24 at 7:21 PM

The Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee helped fund research that resulted in a now-famous dossier containing allegations about President Trump’s connections to Russia and possible coordination between his campaign and the Kremlin, people familiar with the matter said.

Marc E. Elias, a lawyer representing the Clinton campaign and the DNC, retained Fusion GPS, a Washington firm, to conduct the research.

After that, Fusion GPS hired dossier author Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence officer with ties to the FBI and the U.S. intelligence community, according to those people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Elias and his law firm, Perkins Coie, retained the company in April 2016 on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the DNC. Before that agreement, Fusion GPS’s research into Trump was funded by an unknown Republican client during the GOP primary.

The Clinton campaign and the DNC, through the law firm, continued to fund Fusion GPS’s research through the end of October 2016, days before Election Day.

Yet Another part of the whole “Russia Did It!!!” lie by the DNC / Clintons comes home to roost.

Seems like everywhere you look, the slime and dirt leads back to one of two sources. The DNC / Clinton Cabal, or Soros. Soros in a war with Russia no doubt pushed the “Russia Did It!!” agenda, but the Clintons funded it and ran with it (and lost).

FWIW, I first saw this story on RT, then did a web search that showed lots of other sources:

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=clinton+paid+russian+dossier&t=ffsb&atb=v77-4&ia=news

Well, at least now the likes of CNN have to admit their ilk are uck. Though they are still spinning it like crazy:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/24/politics/fusion-gps-clinton-campaign/index.html

Brian Fallon, the Clinton campaign’s national press secretary and now a CNN political contributor, tweeted Tuesday that he wasn’t aware of the connection between the campaign and the dossier authored by Steele, but “if I had, I would have volunteered to go to Europe and try to help him.”

“I have no idea what Fusion or Steele were paid but if even a shred of that dossier ends up helping (Justice Department special counsel Robert) Mueller, it will prove money well spent,” he tweeted.

DNC communications director Xochitl Hinojosa said in a statement Tuesday: “Tom Perez and the new leadership of the DNC were not involved in any decision-making regarding Fusion GPS, nor were they aware that Perkins Coie was working with the organization. But let’s be clear, there is a serious federal investigation into the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia, and the American public deserves to know what happened.”

Yeah, right, hoping a steaming pile of shit lies is “helping”…

Oh well, at least they acknowledged the story exists…

Subscribe to feed

Advertisements

About E.M.Smith

A technical managerial sort interested in things from Stonehenge to computer science. My present "hot buttons' are the mythology of Climate Change and ancient metrology; but things change...
This entry was posted in News Related, Political Current Events and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

48 Responses to Clinton Paid For “Russian Dossier”

  1. Hifast says:

    The most interesting thing here is the WaPo and NYT are running it.

  2. jim2 says:

    More popcorn!!

  3. Larry Ledwick says:

    Reposting here as it is directly relevant.

    Justice Dept lifts gag order on informant for the Uranium One scandal tonight just hours before the JFK files go public. Guess which is going to get covered in the mainstream media? This will allow Congress to get into these details without being micromanaged by the media and screaming DNC advocates.

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/25/justice-department-provides-fbi-uranium-one-informant-to-congress.html

  4. Larry Ledwick says:

    Looks like a blitz offense is going on, all the chickens are coming home to roost at the same time.

    http://thehill.com/homenews/house/357005-house-gop-launches-pair-of-inquiries-into-hillary-clinton

    On Tuesday, top House Republicans launched a pair of investigations. The Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform committees will jointly investigate the FBI’s probe into Clinton’s handling of classified documents. Meanwhile, the latter committee with the Intelligence committee will jointly probe the sale of a uranium company to a Russian firm when Clinton was secretary of State.

    The seemingly coordinated investigations — which were announced within a half-hour of each other — is sure to fire up the conservative base and infuriate Democrats who want House investigators to more rigorously probe Russian efforts to meddle in the 2016 election in favor of Donald Trump.

  5. David A says:

    “is sure to fire up the conservative base and infuriate Democrats who want House investigators to more rigorously probe Russian efforts to meddle in the 2016 election in favor of Donald Trump”

    Sheesh, it has been a year of investigation with a very large team of attorneys spying on all Trump communications, and all based on DNC funded lies delivered to the FBI. They appear to have nothing on Trump whatsoever.

  6. David A says:

    Does anyone else remember an earlier story about McCain being the one to give the “collusion accusations” to the FBI? Is that still possible with the current timeline revealing the DNC funding the investigation?
    If not, was McCain just making this up?

  7. David A says:

    Here is a link to McCain’s story. Supposedly he gave this information to the FBI in late 2016.
    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/10/fbi-chief-given-dossier-by-john-mccain-alleging-secret-trump-russia-contacts

  8. David A says:

    And per Larry’s Fox link above…

    “AFTER April 2016, the Clinton Campaign and DNC then began financing Fusion GPS to create the “Russian Dossier”. Christopher Steele began in June 2016 – The “Russian dossier” did not start assembly until commissioned by Clinton and the DNC.”

    So how does McCain fit in?
    The O admin denied they were involved as did the DNC. Was McCain willfully providing cover for them?

  9. Larry Ledwick says:

    Supposedly McCain hand delivered the dossier, so he apparently acted as an agent of the DNC to provide a “credible source” for the information to trigger the FBI investigation.

    Whether this is just his hatred of Trump or a demonstration of the Uniparty Establishment hard to say at this point.

    http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/313716-mccain-gave-dossier-containing-sensitive-information-to-fbi

  10. Larry Ledwick says:

    At the time it was alleged he got the dossier from a British Diplomat (would be interesting to see the connections of that British diplomat to the Clinton Foundation and Soros)

    http://nypost.com/2017/01/11/john-mccain-i-gave-russia-blackmail-dossier-on-trump-to-fbi/

  11. David A says:

    Yet apparently the FBI investigation was fully aware of the creation of this dossier BEFORE McCain supposedly delivered it to them?

    “] As summer turned to fall, Steele became concerned that the U.S. government was not taking the information he had uncovered seriously enough, according to two people familiar with the situation.

    In October, anticipating that funding supplied through the original client would dry up, Steele and the FBI reached a verbal understanding: He would continue his work looking at the Kremlin’s ties to Trump and receive compensation for his efforts.”

  12. David A says:

    McCain did not turn over this information ( pack of lies?) until after the election.

  13. p.g.sharrow says:

    It would appear to me that this was a part of the actions of a Cabal of willing actors all bent toward the same outcome. STOP the erosion of their building of the Liberal Progressive Dark State control over government. Trump and the Tea Party, Conservatives, Drive to restore limited Constitutional government, are the greatest danger to their creation of Utopia and must be stopped by any means. Hillary was their hope of cementing their gains during the Obamanation. So I doubt that there is one responsible person directing this activity. There are hundreds of willing actors here all doing their part to build and protect the creation of their idea of the enlightened rule of the Elite, They must protect the populaces from it’s unenlightened foolishness.
    Trump was not supposed to win, He is the Beast that will destroy all of their dreams. Every thing that they throw at him and his supporters, fails. GOD conspires against them!
    Everything points to a State Department/CIA Dark State, dirty tricks operation in the creation and dissemination of this dossier and witch hunt to GET Trump. As if some how, some one will remove Trump and his backers and install Hillary, restore the Obamanation to power.
    Just like the McCarthy/Nixon hunt to ferret out communists embedded in government it will be necessary to dig out all of the many Liberal Progressive fanatics that have infested the top levels of local, state, and federal government…pg

  14. Larry Ledwick says:

    Apparently the WSJ is reporting with an editorial board statement on the dossier and investigation.
    This may be going full watergate now if the major media suddenly decides to protect themselves they need to throw Clinton and the DNC under the bus.

    [WSJ normal “to read the whole article subscribe” thing]
    https://www.chicksonright.com/2017/10/26/wsj-publishes-scathing-piece-democrats-russians-fbi/

  15. Glenn999 says:

    from the depths of a wicked swamp
    to an altar under the blood moon
    lefties scurrying into the crevices.
    Now seeking proposals for scaffold prototypes to be built on mall.

  16. philjourdan says:

    Another piece of the puzzle that is Trump. These revelations (Hollywood, Russian Influence) are NOT secrets. The difference is they are now hitting the YSM. There is a plan. What, I am not sure. But the drips are starting to turn into a stream.

  17. gallopingcamel says:

    The FBI is clearly so corrupt that it needs to be defunded and a new agency created to take its place. The real problem is find an honest man to run the NFBI (New FBI). Probably we will get another J. Edgar Hoover and things will get even worse than they are now.

    A country that can’t punish political criminals like the Clintons is doomed.

  18. gallopingcamel says:

    The only good news I can see in the current crisis is the way Democrats in general and the DNC in particular are running like cockroaches as the lights go on.

    This is contrary to the normal Democrat practice of circling the wagons to protect the Clintons. Susan McDougal did jail time for the Clintons for their thievery in Alabama. The Clintons have a patsy (Hernadez) lined up for the Uranium One scandal but it may not be enough this time around as there are many people in legal jeopardy in this conspiracy. Someone is going to break ranks and accept a plea bargain.

  19. Larry Ledwick says:

    Hmmmm — Donna Brazil goes on record about how Hillary manipulated the DNC into becoming a giant ATM for her campaign and took effective financial control of the party a year before she had the nomination. As all things Clinton, not technically illegal but very much leaning toward the corrupt and unethical with the typical Clinton, “do what ever it takes” style of control behind the scenes.

    https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/11/02/clinton-brazile-hacks-2016-215774

    With recent events in the special prosecutors investigation I think we will see a lot of folks airing dirty laundry to paint themselves as victims of a corrupt system that they had no control over.

  20. Larry Ledwick says:

    Another view of Donna Brazil’s comments on the DNC manipulations.

    http://offendedamerica.com/donna-brazile-admits-dnc-massive-fraud/

  21. E.M.Smith says:

    RT is running the Donna Brazil story too. Pointing out a “pay for canidacy and control” scheme.

    Interviewinv a “stategic” consultant abouf the strategy by DNC et al to deligitimize Trump. (On thd Worlds Apartshow)

    At least it explains the stupidity of choosing Hillary as a candidate. (The RT strategist phrased if as “a candidate who could lose to anyone”… clufull, thatguy :-)

  22. A C Osborn says:

    EM, Google Donna Brazil and the stories are all over the press, including one where she not only blames Clinton for destroying the DNC, but Obama as well.
    She has reall unloaded on them all.
    I wonder how many others will now follow her lead?
    http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/02/donna-brazile-slams-debbie-obama-for-running-the-party-into-the-ground-giving-hillary-control/

  23. Ian W says:

    Listening to Market Levin on talk radio. His take is that Mueller intends to bankrupt Manafort ,by putting him under house arrest as a ‘flight risk ‘ despite his family- and thus stopping him working . Mueller has also stopped Manafort from cashing in a life insurance policy claiming that it is fruits of money laundering. So Manafort now has no income and expensive lawyers to support.
    These people are not nice.

  24. cdquarles says:

    @Ian W,

    House arrest does not stop you from working, necessarily. Arrangements can be made with the authorities. They know that you have a job and know where you are supposed to be at what time. The monitor tells them where you are as long as you’re wearing it. As long as the timed location conforms to the stated parameters, you are not in any additional legal jeopardy. The legal cloud, however, could do so.

  25. Ian W says:

    @cdquarles. Mr Manafort works as a lobbyist and political advisor to foreign governments. He needs to travel and have private discussion with many people. This is not feasible with FBI listening to all conversations and banning travel to his customers.

  26. cdquarles says:

    @ Ian W, then his indictment would keep him from working (for who’d want to employ someone under the Fed Gov’s microscope), house arrest notwithstanding.

  27. p.g.sharrow says:

    Debbie bragged before the primary season started that the DNC Central committee had made arrangements to insure that Hillary Clinton would be the next president.
    I remember her statement in an interview early on before any Democratic candidates were named.
    Waserman was an Obama/Clinton place holder and did only what was needed to keep any real Democratic Party Chairman from appearing that might protect the party.

    It would appear that those left in the Democratic Party will be taking a leap to the far left. as that is the only leadership that will be left standing and it also appears that Soros is getting anxious to set off a violent revolution such as he witnessed in his youth. I think that that will be a damp squib, at least here in America…pg

  28. philjourdan says:

    @P.G. – Re: Debbie’s brag.

    The sad part about all these latest “revelations” is that none of this is new! Not Harvey, not Donna, not Uranium one, none of it! The “alternate” press has been reporting on it for months! The difference now is that the YSM is reporting it.

    More so than any one scandal, is the reality that the YSM is virtually useless now.

  29. p.g.sharrow says:

    @philjourdan; We may have reached critical mass with the Brazile tell all, or maybe tell some ;-) The YSM “journalists” will have to pile on to save face and for the first time Left Wing political Elites will sacrifice one of their own in their attempt to escape attention. Time for renewal in the body politic. I fear Sessions is just a little ankle biter when we need an attack dog to go after these traitors…pg

  30. Larry Ledwick says:

    Not too sure where this belongs but will put it here:

    According to twitter :

    Stealth Jeff‏ @drawandstrike 51 minutes ago

    Need some verification: being reported that 50 SEALED INDICTMENTS were delivered to the Eastern District Court in Virginia today.

    This would make over EIGHTY sealed indictments delivered in the last 8 days here & the DC District Court.

    I think something really big will be breaking soon – maybe Friday?? While President Trump is over seas so he can maintain some distance (both real and figuratively) from the events.

    The rumor mill on Twitter is all aflutter about who is about to get busted and for what.

    Stealth Jeff‏ @drawandstrike 54 minutes ago

    So looks like TODAY’S big development wasn’t the UNSEALING of any indictments, it was the delivering of FIFTY new sealed indictments… if this pans out.

    Stealth Jeff‏ @drawandstrike 54 minutes ago

    Need those with legal experience to weigh in here. How unusual would it be to have 50 sealed indictments land in DC & Eastern Virginia District courts in just 8 days?

  31. David A says:

    Larry, I pulled this from the daily wire….
    “Around 40% percent of criminal cases that pass through the D.C. Circuit court are sealed, largely to protect vulnerable witnesses, or because defendants have struck plea bargains with Federal prosecutors in return for limited sentences or government protection. This makes sense if you consider Federal prosecutors often handle major drug cases, cases of conspiracy, and Federal racketeering charges.

    There is one indication that Mueller has at least one more indictment up his sleeve. The Manafort indictment is marked as INDICTMENT (B), which presumes there’s an “INDICTMENT (A)” lurking somewhere, maybe in “sealed document #200.” The subject of that indictment is anyone’s guess; it could be Flynn, or it could be Tony Podesta who hinted in his resignation letter yesterday that he was under scrutiny.

    We know indictment A has not been revealed. At 40 percent unsealed as a percentage a large grouping of unsealed all at once would be very unusual.

  32. David A says:

    Correction, a large grouping of sealed would be very unusual. I do not know the average number per day.

  33. David A says:

    Per this link… https://ballotpedia.org/United_States_District_Court_for_the_District_of_Columbia

    about 2600 to 3000 cases are filed yearly. WAG of 230 days means about 12 per day or 4 to 5 sealed per day. 50 sealed in one day would be very unusual.

    The link also gives the judges and the admin which appointed them.
    50 sealed in one day could well mean people are talking, and the seal is part of the deal.

  34. Larry Ledwick says:

    This hits both computer security issues and the DNC hack, Wikileaks released another vault of data that asserts the CIA intentionally wrote their hacking tools so they could impersonate legitimate software like Kaspersky labs ( this is not at all shocking – the inverse is also true, the Russians or Chinese could plant clues in software that they wrote that leaves bread crumbs pointing at the CIA)

    Given any competent coder knows these are possibilities it quickly turns into a he said she said he said they said we said game where there really is no way to be sure who is really trying to game who and it is problematic to assume the apparent culprit is the real culprit. There are just too many highly skilled players out there who could game the situation to point at any other player. There could even be multiple players trying to point things at each other.

    Is WikiLeaks being played by the Russians or Chinese or Koreans to embarrass the CIA, did the CIA really do the obviously logical thing, or maybe some other entity throwing multiple layers of misdirection up to hide the true culprit and hang the hack around the neck of the CIA because after Snowden the are the designated bad guy for all IT hacking problems. Or is this Kaspersky using wikileaks to defend themselves from accusations they are tightly controlled / connected to the SVR/GRU in Russia?

    http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/11/wikileaks-drops-vault-8-cia-wrote-code-impersonate-russian-anti-virus-giant/

  35. E.M.Smith says:

    Anyone worth their salt (old Roman salary) knows that you need to have a ‘cover’ when doing system cracking (commonly, but incorrectly, called hacking…) so the very first thing you do is find some other site(s) to bounce off of. Preferably with a reliable VPN in the middle that is in a non-cooperate non-extradite relationship with your target. Then, for extra credit, you use a patsy between you and the VPN (so some pwned PC in some poor sots dorm room or executive suite…) where you put a kit on the patsy so your VPN to the patsy is hidden and traffic seems to originate from them to the remote VPN. When done with the link, you tear out your kit and make sure no logs showed you there. I prefer to add one more layer, with an air-gap to public WiFi between my laptop and the ISP to the patsy, but some folks think that overkill.

    Now, once you have this 3-Card Monty between you and what you do, the next thing you do is put a cover on who’s doing it. This can range from selecting the time zone you pretend to be in to choosing a language for activity. (IF I were to write any ‘malicious’ kit to break into a system, my comments would NOT be in English. I’d likely use Spanish just ’cause few folks do, and my Russian is very rusty….)

    As most all systems hacks and cracks these days are script / kit driven, you use a kit / script that you like, but preferably one that ‘fingers’ some other person or agency. Any temporary files, links, ‘whatever’, ought to be in your language of choice and look like someone else. So, for example, if you exfiltrate data to a target file on some other box, it ought not be named “MyMacBook_DNChack” but instead something like “Министерство” or “ElMinisterio”.

    Furthermore, you ought to assure your system is running a clock set to some other time zone. (I run the blog in GMT, for example). Now any discovery of time stamp data (that ought not be able to swim upstream, but might end up on your output) gives no clue about where you were located. So, for example, if the DNC hack is fingered as 4 PM EST and your released files are time stamped 1 PM last access time… well, it isn’t going to take a genius to figure it was Pacific Time…

    I also assert any hacker worth their name ought to be clueful enough to copy things with full preservation of time stamps and ownership bits, including “last access”; that I shut off on my file systems, for obvious reasons… but also to include that constantly writing last access times back to disk or worse, SSD and SD, is just not worth it. ) In /etc/fstab an entry like:

    LABEL=MyDisk_ntfs		/MyDisk/ms	ntfs	defaults,noauto,noatime
    

    has the “noatime” shut off access time updating.

    Now I actually will go an extra step in that I’ll deliberately screw with the clock as things are touched to make wild and crazy time stamps. Scattering some disinformation is a great way to slow down any opponent… This can be automated in a script and run on your exfiltrated copy if desired. Some folks prefer to just set the time to zero (start of time) and they ‘touch’ everything. Yeah, it works, but not as much fun as having every file touched one hour apart and starting 2 years ago ;-)

    There’s some more bits, but you get the idea. Hide your physical location, disguise your language and time zone, use kit that has someone else written all over it, exfiltrate through a non-cooperating jurisdiction, preserve then jigger time stamps but NEVER use your own, same thing for UID / GID markers, and operate as though your language and working hours match your kit of choice. I like to add “And if all else fails, have an air-gap WiFi link between you and initial IPS connection” – a van with blacked out windows outside a wardrive patsy helps.

    Do even 1/2 of that, the typical “experts” from government will claim it was someone else somewhere else.

    FWIW, that’s just a short overview. In practice, there are many bits of finesse added to the set. Things like bouncing off routers instead of computers, having IP NAT hiding your IP, doing MAC address spoofing, having a burner system / WiFi dongle / whatever that is cheap enough to dispose when done (at one point putting serial numbers into CPUs was being done, now we’ve moved on to DRM issues… so being able to burn your $9 C.H.I.P. with WiFi included so the MAC goes with it is a nice cheap choice…)

    That’s why I’ve typically said “Nobody can say for sure who did it until there is an arrest AND they confessed.” Even finding logs on the computer and a record of traffic into it isn’t enough. It could just be that you’ve arrested the Patsy… (Remote operate their computer for the system crack, exfiltrate the files, leave a copy there, then about 4 hours later copy that exfiltrated set slowly to another site where you change dates / export it. Now even if the ISP records are searched, it shows lots of download to the Patsy at the time of the crack, but not much exiting their machine, with some hours later a slow drain of just the copy; that looks unconnected. Put it on a public download site and even that looks like it was part of the crack / exfiltrate by the Patsy and any subsequent downloads from the public site are all figured as ‘not the hacker’…)

    A lot of work? Well, yeah.

    Frankly, that’s a large part of why I’m uninterested in cracking / hacking other folks computers. It’s just too damn much work. I’d rather be paid a nice hourly rate to thwart them. The pay is better, the risks nearly nil, and you can get better gear on the company budget ;-) Besides, The Hunt is more fun than being The Hunted ;-)

    So IMHO, anyone who says “We have proven it was FOO!” when there has been no arrest is just blowing smoke. At best you can say “The attack appears to originate from the Ministry Of FOO and using their tools”.

    In reality, someone could have just pwned a key router and be pretending to be them. (Install hard route for packets of the type used originating from the target going to the destination that sends them to your site. Unless they have logging on that router AND get the logs to inspect AND can show they were not changed, it just isn’t going to show up if done well.) So capture a router at the Ministry Of FOO or their ISP, and send a selected data stream to a particular computer (that could be a pwned one at the Ministry or one on a similar IP range that looks near enough to them) and you can hard finger Ministry Of Foo… Why folks put change control on routers and lock them down hard, plus run IPS / IDS systems and more… to prevent that kind of stuff. Luckily, lots of folks don’t do it or don’t do it well enough…

    But sure, just because the NSA / CIA etc. etc. have had tools leak showing they can masquerade as The Russians, that’s no reason to think they would actually DO it, and clearly 100% of All Bad Things were done by those nasty ‘ol Ruskies… /SARC;!

  36. David A says:

    … Ok, yet were there really 50 sealed indictments ( in one day) filed in the DC federal court? ( have not had time to do that research)

  37. Larry Ledwick says:

    The Clintons might have something else to occupy them soon.

    From Twitter:
    NBC News‏Verified account @NBCNews
    2 hours ago

    JUST IN: Attorney General Jeff Sessions has directed senior federal prosecutors to evaluate whether a special counsel should be appointed to investigate concerns raised by Republicans, including alleged unlawful dealings by Clinton Foundation and the sale of a uranium company

  38. E.M.Smith says:

    Well, “At Last!”…

    Looks like the Special Prosecutor is the weapon of choice for gator hunting in the swamp these days…

  39. philjourdan says:

    Looks like the Special Prosecutor is the weapon of choice for gator hunting in the swamp these days…

    Down in Louisiana, all it takes is a liberal on trawling line.

  40. Larry Ledwick says:

    Hmm this is interesting – from twitter:

    Charles Ortel‏ @CharlesOrtel
    11 hours ago

    1/The @ClintonFdn NEVER was legally organized or operated, yet it solicited across state lines using mails, phones, internet and NEVER validly accounted for revenues or expenses ANYWHERE…
    2/In a best case the @ClintonFdn could have held Presidential Records in a Presidential Archive/Research Center, but it NEVER complied with relevant state/federal/foreign statutes…

    3/Illegal international activities in the name of the @ClintonFdn began in 2001–work with International AIDS Trust, American India Foundation, and then with “Clinton Foundation HIV/AIDS Initiiative” NEVER were authorized, charitable, or controlled from a U.S. base, as required..

    4/In 2004, following years of noncompliant “audits”, directors of the @ClintonFdn including @TerryMcAuliffe (Dem Chair) allowed more than $60 million to be DIVERTED in what appears to be bank and wire FRAUD…

    5/It is more than a bit “SURPRISING” that @ClintonFdn FRAUDS PERSISTED from 2001 through 2008, while George W. Bush was President, and under Mueller’s watch while he headed @FBI

    6/The official story concerning @HillaryClinton becoming Secretary of State is worse than FAKE NEWS–arrangements likely began well before November 2008 when many conspired to hide the true state of the @ClintonFdn …

    7/ It seems to me that the Clintons and Team @BarackObama started COLLUDING to rig elections around June 2008, and never have stopped, BOLDLY pulling swamplevers and molding UNIPARTY…

    8/ Tammany Hall, Teapot Dome, and Watrgate are kidstuff compared to ways in which Presidential “Foundations and donor charities flout applicable state, federal, foreign laws…

    9/ If @realDonaldTrump wants to DRAIN THE SWAMP, he will encourage a FULL SCALE INVESTIGATION into charities holding a total of $5 TRILLION in assets to see whether donors enriched friends or played poiitics or both…especially academia, vanity charities…

    10/FAKE charities like @ClintonFdn , their directors, their advisors, their donors ALL MUST BE INVESTIGATED, and SEVERELY PUNISHED TO PROVE THAT NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW, ESPECIALLY DYNASTIC POLITICAL FAMILIES @realDonaldTrump

    Perhaps new “leaders” will help provide honest accounting of funds sent towards @ClintonFdn for work “fighting HIV/AIDS” in Zimbabwe?

    Imperator_Rex‏ @Imperator_Rex3
    18 minutes ago

    Imperator_Rex Retweeted Charles Ortel

    The deadline for the CF tax returns is midnight. In that light, Charles Ortel’s (one of the top experts on CF fraud) thoughts are important. Thread starts here, you may
    need to go to his feed to read it all 👇

    Season this with rumors of large numbers of sealed indictments lurking out there and things could get mighty interesting soon.

    Buying popcorn.

  41. Larry Ledwick says:

    https://www.intellihub.com/a-total-of-1183-sealed-government-indictments-leaked-as-of-wednesday-morning/

    A total of 1183 sealed government indictments as of Wednesday morning?
    By Staff Writer –
    November 15, 2017

    WASHINGTON (INTELLIHUB) — A list of a total of 1183 sealed indictments and their jurisdictions was posted to the Innerweb over the past few days and the number keeps growing.

    The “.xlsx” file posted to Google Drive reveals as of Wednesday 172 of the sealed indictments are to be issued in the Central District of California, 108 are to be issued in the District of Colorado, 99 in the Northern District of California, 35 in the District of Columbia, and the list goes on.

    Although the districts in which the indictments will be issued and the number of indictments in each district are listed in the file, the indictments remain sealed at this time so there is no way of telling who or what entity is being indicted and what the person or entity is being indicted for.

    However, it is anticipated that the indictments revolve around the Russian investigation into 2016 election meddling and/or possibly the Uranium One scandal that was heavily exposed by Intellihub editor-in-chief Shepard Ambellas.

    You can view the listings for all 1183 of the sealed indictments which were released in the following tweet:

    Link
    [https://drive.google.com/file/d/15579P4VztZO0aNvejJasb1yOvXUCp3vS/view]

  42. E.M.Smith says:

    It’s all well and good to have all this talk about sealed this and indicted that; but my question is:

    When are we going to see some Dimocrats doing a perp walk?

    Until then, it’s just political theatre with a bad refreshment counter…

  43. pouncer says:

    “it’s just political theatre with a bad refreshment counter”

    The three branches of federal government are the Kabuki, the Farce, and the Charade.

    The Kabuki features a fixed repertory cast of several players in black robes high upstage, doing various ceremonial movements rooted in portrayal of ancient traditions, while downstage a pair of colorful actors — which change weekly — dialog in mock topical combat.

    The Farce is distinguished by elaborate set pieces featuring many rooms separated by doors (stairs, ladders, firemens’ poles, etc) in and out and up and down which a horde of players rush about, changing costumes and lying to each other. The combination of characters-pairs and rooms defines a particular lie. Typically the humor of the Farce arises from the difficulties characters have in keeping straight which room, behind which door, and with which partners, the particular lie is being told — at the height a character may “spin” about in a revolving door absolutely contradicting himself on each side of the door with each partner addressed.

    The Charade is a sort of live action shadow play, in which each speech and action and property is brought into the spotlight for a professed reason absolutely contradicted by another hidden reason. Unlike the temporary combatants in Kabuki or the rapidly exchanging actors in Farce, the players in Charade, once on-stage, tend to remain — and remain, and remain. It is the prolonged and slowly evolving deception that distinguishes Charade from faster paced forms. Everyone who takes the stage, stays, and naturally therefore, the stage is very crowded. Plots advance slowly as players — characters — emerge from the pack in the wings and elbow towards nominal center. At center, characters compete in the attempt to leave behind their original claims and positions while claiming the most believable, and least realistic, pitch to their audience.

  44. philjourdan says:

    @Larry – Re:

    4/In 2004, following years of noncompliant “audits”, directors of the @ClintonFdn including @TerryMcAuliffe (Dem Chair) allowed more than $60 million to be DIVERTED in what appears to be bank and wire FRAUD…

    I am beginning to see part of the plan, but like the blind man, still say the elephant’s leg is a tree.

    McAwful is running for president in 2020. Trump could have taken him out this past year (ala McDonnell), but that would have given the election to Gillespie who is a fervid Anti-trumper. (A shame because the alternative is worse – an old style Southern democrat – ie racist pig). Trump is holding that card until it best suits himself, not the party trying to dump him (Republicans).

    I will be glad to see McAwful go down. He is a reprehensible mental midget that deserves every bit of the trouble he has brought upon himself.

  45. E.M.Smith says:

    @Pouncer:

    Wonderfully said!

    @PhilJourdan:

    What I find interesting about this all is to watch the Republicans who try to sabotage Trump as they like their swamp the way it is.

    Trump is doing just what I’d hoped he would do: Slap the Republican Party up side the head as much as the Democrats.

    I doubt anyone else with a more compliant personality could stand up to the roasting sent his way.

    I doubt any of the Swamp Creatures really understand the meaning of Trump. Enough people were so fed up with their crap, from BOTH sides, they really wanted someone to tear it all down. IF this doesn’t work, things will get a lot worse before they get better. The Kleptocracy thinks they are above it all (and passed laws to make it so) but a mob with tar and feathers and pitchforks cares not about law…

    Sigh.

    I hope Trump makes it for 8 years, but the attempt at a Color Revolution to take him out in 2 or 3 is in full throat, and his own party is split with plenty in opposition to the needed change. Still, if anyone can do it, it’s Trump.

  46. philjourdan says:

    @E.M.

    I doubt any of the Swamp Creatures really understand the meaning of Trump.

    I agree with what you said. But I do wonder if they are “incapable” of understanding, or just refuse to understand. When Trump jumped up on the scene, what he was doing was hard to fathom in the context of the swamp. It did not make sense. But it has been 2 years now, and he has not changed. So those who wanted to think it was just an act, should by now realize it is not an act, and this is the real McCoy. Yet they still do not get it.

    I said before the election that very little would get done under Trump. I expected both sides to attack him. And that is being proven out time and again. I also told another blogger that conservatives would have to wander in the desert for years in order to get a party that represented them (I saw it as a new party, but the establishment is going to make sure that the republicans, as a national party, cease to exist in 4-8 years). When Trump is done, we will have a conservative minority party. But one that will grow as socialism continues to fail.

Anything to say?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s