A video that looks at the impact of layering definition changes on top of each other and the insanity that is “Hate Crime”.
Looks like in part of the UK, if you talk to a woman and she doesn’t like it (i.e. you do not agree with her) you can go up on mysogeny and “hate crime”. If women thought it was hard to get men to talk before, well, it’s gonna get a whole lot more difficult.
Do I think this is a loony interpretation? No, not at all. Here in California, in Managers And The Law, I had legal training in what could be considered “sexual harassment”. It includes things like just looking at a woman or saying “Your hair looks nice today.” Seriously. Who is to decide if it was an offense? The person claiming an offense. That IS the legal standard in California. So I don’t doubt this applies in the UK as well.
I like the line, which I have thought myself, that this will result in a lot of women being alone and turning into Cat Ladies. I know that in California I will not EVER make ANY compliment to any woman (maybe excepting the spouse, depending on her mood).
Does contain some F-bombs, and some offensive other speech, so be advised. IF you might possibly be offended, chose not to “go there”. The video is largely just an animated graphic with voice over, so not a lot to read but some news clippings and photos of signs.
Now one other interesting thing this expansion of “Hate Crime” has not thought about. What happens when an Antifa member is blowing whistles or shouting in bullhorns and a woman is present? Realize this law lets ANYONE, even one NOT the woman in question, bring the case for harassment. It is certainly “unwanted engagement” and it IS directed at a woman, so by definition it IS a “Hate Crime” under this guideline.
They are hanging an awful lot on the idea that the Courts will be packed with liberal judges who will properly persecute the Evil Men and not prosecute the Antifa Members…
I would consider the video to be “crazy talk” but for the fact that I have had (Corporate paid for and mandatory) training on just such absurdity in California law.
BTW, I’m finding the “richness” of stuff on BitChute rather attractive. Saltier than what I usually set as my limit, but it is refreshing to hear other folks talking about seeing the same stuff I’ve seen.
So, women, over to you’all I guess. Figure out how to fix this kind of legal crap or start shopping for your next cat… and don’t bother with the beauty parlor / hair doo / new dress / whatever. Anyone with a brain will be scrupulously not noticing (and after a bit of practice not even caring either) since the alternative can be jail time. I learned to just treat all women as drones with no attractive qualities what so ever. It was required, after all. So “like it or change it”. Up to you.