Bongino 1183 Did Soros Use Obama To Attack Rivals?

This Bongino episode does more taking names, making timelines, and connecting the players.

Has an interesting thread that connects Soros to Obama to both a “do not investigate” list and potentially a preferential investigation list with competitors of Soros on it. An interesting theory…

Subscribe to feed


About E.M.Smith

A technical managerial sort interested in things from Stonehenge to computer science. My present "hot buttons' are the mythology of Climate Change and ancient metrology; but things change...
This entry was posted in Political Current Events and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to Bongino 1183 Did Soros Use Obama To Attack Rivals?

  1. Another Ian says:

    Around this area

    The question at the end

    “I wonder what the hell he knew about Obama.”

  2. Gary says:

    I hope A.G. Barr doesn’t quit over Trump’s stupid tweets and channels Bongino.

  3. tucsonaustrian says:

    Don‘t fall for the progressive trolling talking points like Barr considering resigning.

  4. Henry Galt says:

    Glenn Beck. goog=

    UKRAINE SCANDAL EXPLAINED: Chalkboard on DNC Collusion, Joe Biden, Soros

  5. E.M.Smith says:

    I like the way Millenial Millie does things.
    Toward the end it becomes a bit of a commercial for info-wars vitamins and then a rant against censorship, including Newsweek getting channels shut down that didn’t have the pro businesses spin on Covid-19 …

    So add Newsweek to the list of TLA pwned and / or China pwned actors. So can still use them to out what are the “approved talking points” and as negative space indicators of probable truth ( I.e. if it became clear Obama was very dirty yet they say nothing, it is confirming…) but clearly they are not to be trusted now.

    So here’s the video:

    And her channel:

  6. E.M.Smith says:

    I put this comment in the last W.O.O.D. but it is better here:

    Bongino discovers my “Be The Mirror” philosophy to some degree. Also the concept of symmetrical play. Use their rules against them. They slap your cheek, you slap theirs just as hard..

  7. tom0mason says:

    And also there’s

  8. p.g.sharrow says:

    I’ve been watching/listening to Bongino as well as Glen Beck. In my opinion Bongino is still scratching the surface, but, In his latest, Glen Beck maybe gets it in it’s full depth! This is a C.I.A. secret dirty OPS dark war. In this case against Russia and anyone that risks getting in their way. They have operatives buried in Media, Buearuacracy and Politics that are well “oiled” with the $Billions that they control. Hillary said that half of Washington was in on the take.

  9. p.g.sharrow says:

    Remember, Shummer said that you don’t go up against the Intell people because they have many ways to destroy you. Brennan is the key man in this attempt to “Get Trump”. The State Department and the Justice Department is full of those people and Trump is the outsider that threatens their cozy club.

  10. E.M.Smith says:


    I agree, but that ignores the “why Russia? and why being cozy with Red China and Jihadi Islam are on the approved list. My best guess is the “naughty & nice” is based on Globalist Cabal friendly vs not.

    I.e. who’s on the ins with Rockefeller banking connected folks and the Bildebergers.

  11. E.M.Smith says:

    As I’ve pointed out before, clearly the main players have heavy top cover. Not one has been indicted/ prosecuted; and they all get big money jobs as soon as fired. The only Agency with that much dark money and clout, IMHO, is the C.I.A. Then there is the historic Governor Clinton CIA connection.

    Add in the Negative Space of near zero “news” reporting of the CIA / British Intel angle and Brennan being lauded on the pwned “news”…

    So that just leaves the question of who is holding the ultimate power over those Agencies? How many were “dirtied up” so their Epstein or similar dossier would keep them on side with the external Globalist Agendas?

  12. Another Ian says:

    “Make Haste, Lay Waste.”

    Make Haste, Lay Waste.

  13. p.g.sharrow says:

    The question of “Who is in power” is not the right question. This is cult of power and mutual protection. You are ether a club member or not. Club members have shared ideals “talking points”, Political Correct, Virtue Signals. If you cross them you become a threat to all and Must be eliminated.
    As I understand it, when Bill Clinton was first Elected AG of Arkansas, he was honest idealistic. But after losing his re-election bid, He realized (maybe Hillary) that to be a successful politician he needed to play ball with the powers that be in the political field.
    In my experience the “justice system” is heavily controlled by these people as they control which Lawyers are allowed to advance in politics and the Judiciary. The “right” people do not get prosecuted. Those that are “difficult” and refuse to play ball, get “dirtied up” and ruined. If you are an honest lawyer that challenges a dirty DA or Judge for election, your practice is decimated by judge selections and delays. COPs get the word that you are to be “Made Dirty” and charged with anything. If you lose against their machine you lose everything. That is why Comey said no Federal Prosecutor would pursue a case against Hillary. There are lots of honest people in the system but they are terrified of getting on the wrong side of the “club” and having their lives distroyed.

  14. Another Ian says:

    Some reading


Comments are closed.