Tag Archives: CO2

SCOTUS Justice Alito said what?

Posted on 16 February 2017 by

A Supreme Court Justice, Alito, seems to have clue about CO2 Continue reading →

Posted in AGW and GIStemp Issues, Political Current Events | Tagged , , , , | 10 Comments

Water World

Posted on 23 May 2015 by

A very nice page with graphs and calculations showing water is what matters, not CO2. Continue reading →

Posted in AGW Science and Background | Tagged , , | 17 Comments

CO2 sigma 13 ratios, again…

Posted on 18 April 2015 by

In past major warming events, such as the Eocene Thermal Maximum, carbon isotopes have shifted to a more C-13 depleted state with no help from human activity or burning fossil fuels at all… Continue reading →

Posted in AGW Science and Background, Earth Sciences | Tagged , , | 6 Comments

A Wonderful Comment on the Benefit of CO2

Posted on 25 March 2015 by

RGBatDuke does a great job of saying just why treerings are a poor thermometer and why CO2 is a Very Good Thing in a comment from WUWT. Continue reading →

Posted in AGW and GIStemp Issues | Tagged , , , , , | 10 Comments

Ice Controls CO2 and Ocean Currents Shift Temperatures

Posted on 5 January 2015 by

A couple of papers that, taken together, say ocean current changes control the ice, and ice controls the CO2 level. Continue reading →

Posted in AGW Science and Background, Science Bits | Tagged , , , , , | 14 Comments

Le Chatelier and his Principle vs The Trouble with Trenberth

Posted on 1 June 2014 by

The Trouble With Trenberth is a failure to appreciate Le Chatelier and his principle, nor to understand just WHERE CO2 radiates, and where water rules the sky. Continue reading →

Posted in AGW Science and Background | Tagged , , , , | 90 Comments

CO2 does not Black Body Radiation make

Posted on 26 May 2014 by

CO2 does not do “black body” radiation and the general assumption that it does radiate IR in that way is simply wrong. It would rather heat up than radiate, so drives convection rather than “back radiation”. So much for “settled science”. Continue reading →

Posted in AGW Science and Background, Science Bits | Tagged , , , , | 35 Comments