This graph was in a link at WUWT. I’ve lost the context and can’t do a proper attribution. At any rate, I find it a very compelling statement about the complete NON-correlation of CO2 levels with temperature levels on our planet. It also shows the “model” results are outside of all reality. Way out in Fantasy Land.
Theoretical CO2 Log Relationship vs 545 Million Years of Reality
There’s just got to be a great write-up wrapped around this graph somewhere. But I don’t have the time to find it, so perhaps someone could do a little “Dig Here!”?
Musings from the Chiefio 
According to Le Chatelier an increase in CO2 should decrease atmospheric heating as CO2 is a poor IR absorber by a factor of seven. Increasing CO2 reduces air’s capacity for water vapor so it cools the atmosphere.
This is exactly what happened from 1930 to 1970 as we geared up for and fought WWII burning down Europe and Japan. In the 70’s we got serious about cleaning up air pollution and the temperature started to rise as water vapor capacity increased.
For more conservative thought, science and humor see: http://adrianvance.blogspot.com “The Two Minute Conservative” 300 word pieces for radio/TV talk show host, opinion page editors and dinner table conversationalists. Also on Kindle.
It is seriously time to leave California:
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-climate-cap-trade-20101216,0,428888.story
Couldn’t find the graph, but the data (see link at bottom ofn article) plotted as time series at
Pingback: Tweets that mention No Correlation « Musings from the Chiefio -- Topsy.com
Roy Spencer’s value of 0.6 C/doubling would fit just nice.
Fits my own rough calc too.
Snow on the usually not very Snowy Mtns here in Oz, in summer. I can’t remember the last time that happened.