I missed this one, but here it is as a recorded event:
Right Side Broadcasting Network is once again able to broadcast live on YouTube.
The first post exoneration rally:
https://rsbnetwork.com/2020/02/president-donald-trump-rally-live-in-manchester-nh-2-10-20/
They have an “RSBN 2” channel on youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCMhQoxdVuBXVidcdvsBtOw
So something of a backup in case of some kind of “technical glitch” on their first channel…
There’s also supposed to be a Periscope feed:
https://www.periscope.tv/RSBNetwork
After exploring the Diamond & Silk site for a good line while (it has videos too) I finally had it sink in that the RSBN feed is on the D&S YouTube channel:
The RSBN Twitter Feed:
https://twitter.com/RSBNetwork
The RSBN Facebook Page:
https://www.facebook.com/rightsidebroadcasting
On Patreon:
My interest?
The one thing about RSBN that made it special was the pre-show and post along with the local / minor political speakers. A lot more variation and interesting stuff. Way better than the snips and cuts and talking heads droning of the MSM coverage.
YouTube stuck their foot in it with censorship. I HATE this political censorship. So it is now my intent to put up a posting for each Trump rally linking to RSBN and anywhere they can broadcast. To the extent YouTube tries to reduce anyone “leveraging” their platform to get Trump positive coverage, I’m going to lever what I can to give some balance back (however small). I’ll keep this up as long as there is YouTube Bias Risk.
It may not be much that I can do, but I’m going to do it. Now if all the other Deep State Opponents did the same… Just sayin’… You can be an “Army of One” even with just sending a link to a friend… or an enemy ;-)
Misc.
Ran into this interesting site “keeping up with Trump” while searching for other RSBN spigots:
https://keepingupwithtrump.com/rsbn-tv/
A pretty good write up of the “ban of RSBN” here:
https://reclaimthenet.org/youtube-livestream-right-side-broadcasting-ban/
Musings from the Chiefio 
The proper phrase, Mr. Smith, is ‘post-acquittal’, not ‘post exoneration.’ I’m sure you know the difference.
Considering he was falsly inculpated, the term is applicable. You could interchange exonerate/exculpate if you like ;-)
Trump was prosecuted for events that didn’t happen, violating laws that don’t exist, by people that are proved liers. The Jury dismissed the case! Not sure acquitted suits the event, Exonerated would be more the case and Post-exoneration fills the present condition.
And, as if to make the point more profound, it snowed in Baghdad today for the first time since 2008.
Trump was impeached. That will not change. Trump was acquitted. That will not change. There were no crimes in the charges. That will not change. Trump was impeached by the only partisan vote in American history. That will not change until the dimocrats do it to the next Republican.
Sorrioso is still wrong. That will not change.
@Serioso:
Yes, technically in the legal process sense, you are correct. Exoneration requures a conviction to reverse and there was no conviction.
But acquittal requires being found innocent of a crime, and there was no crime.
As we dont really have a word in common English for “Not only is he not guity of anything, but there was no crime to prosecute, and the jury tossed the whole thing out showing the person innocent on all counts and assertions, restoring their good name.”
I suppose we could invent one. It needs the “reversal of accusation” of exonerate and the never convicted (of the non-crime) of acquitted. Perhaps like the Klingon “restoration”
https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Discommendation
Though that requires a prior finding of discommodation… perhaps the challenge ritual is cliser
https://lcars.ucip.org/index.php/Klingon_Rituals_&_Traditions#Challenge_Rituals
Though they, too, use “exoneration” in the common usage sense of “case tossed your honor restored” rather than the more limited legal sense of conviction reversed.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/exonerate
So in the end, I think it is Just Fine to stick with that second common meaning of exonerate. Cleared from accusation.
Yes. You can be an army of one. And make a difference if you keep at it.
Language is funny. We all know he’s guilty as charged on both counts. But not convicted. And not exonerated. But feared. Fear matters.
Serioso, Like p.g.sharrow says…
‘Trump was prosecuted for events that didn’t happen, violating laws that don’t exist, by people that are proved liers. The Jury dismissed the case! .’
Re ‘fearing’ Trump’ I do ‘not fear a leader who upholds the US Constitution. Those who undermine it like yr Democrats who attempted, from 2016, to bring about a coup of the elected President, these are more to be feared.
Serioso says:
12 February 2020 at 10:35 pm
I’m not sure just who “We” are.
From where I sit, WE know that this was a frameup by the DNC and the Socialists to sweep America into the garbage can of history, just like every Nation that has ever followed them into the Valleys of the Great Rock Candy Mountain. Socialists Know that they have to cheat to win and that they must use Force to maintain their gains. WE KNOW that socialists killed 100 million people during the last century in their failed attempt to enforce socialism on the world’s population.
For 500 years the “Philosophy of More – Utopia” has been the darling of the Intelligentsia of the World. It is done, and it will be swept into the dust bin of history. Trump is merely the tool…pg
Both Counts?
This counts ;-)
“We all know” lemmings just follow each other right off a cliff once the first one jumps.
Sorri-oso
YOu are guilty of ignorance. But is that a crime? Neither of the charges are a crime. They are too subjective. Take the latest snit of the democrats. They are upset that Trump MAY HAVE influenced the DOJ to reduce the sentence recommendation. NO law was changed. And the final say is up to the judge. So where is the crime? Your boss says make 2 graphs instead of 3. Again, is that a crime? Trump is the boss. Get use to it.
Your ignorance is 2 fold
#1 – you do not understand the separation of powers
#2 – You have no clue about the Constitution
The facts of the matter are – Trump did nothing to abuse his power. He exercised the .powers granted to him by the Constitution. He is in FULL control of foreign policy per the Constitution. NOT congress. He had a disagreement with Congress on a well established precedent upheld by the SCOTUS so took it to the courts once again, as the founders designed,
ANyone with any knowledge of the Constitution, and SCOTUS history knows that he is NOT guilty. Those ignorant of those things think he is. The difference is that we KNOW, and you just believe.
And you are wrong.
TDS Much?
First off, who is the “we all”? It clearly does not include me as I most certainly do NOT think him guilty of anything. So your “projection” is noted.
“Charged” is interesting as one is “charged” with crimes. Please cite what LAWS were broken. US CC or UCMJ or statute. Actual on the books law, not a phony baloney made up nothing like “abuse of power” that just means “Democrats unhappy”.
“Not convicted” is correct as you can’t be convicted of a non-crime.
“Not exhonorated” is clearly false. Did you not read my reply with the dictionary quoted? Here it is again:
2 : to clear from accusation or blame
Since that is EXACTLY what happened: Trump was cleared from the impeachment accusations; therefore he WAS AND IS EXHONORATED. By DEFINITION. Literally.
Then that fear thing. That’s just you. Trump supporters do not fear him at all. TDS Sufferers and Swamp Creatures fear him, but that is because they have addled brains and suffer delusions.